Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro M3000M

    In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price
    Quadro M3000M Check Price

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro M3000M here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops
    Quadro M3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Quadro M3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type System Shared GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M3000M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 750 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 4−5 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 3−4 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 12−14 60−65
    medium / 1080p 5−6 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

    Full Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Quadro M3000M
    Architecture Gen. 8 Broadwell Maxwell
    Code name Broadwell GT3e GM204
    Type Laptop Mobile workstation
    Release date 2 June 2015 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 48 1,024
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 1050 MHz
    Boost Clock 1150 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 40.80 67.20
    Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 2,150 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s
    Shared memory + -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5.0
    OpenGL 4.4 4.5
    OpenCL 2.0 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.80 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 253 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized large
    Optimus +
    Quick Sync +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares