NVS 510 vs Quadro M3000M

When choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro M3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 510 and Quadro M3000M.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro M3000M Check Price

Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:

Quadro M3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M3000M has 114% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 253 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	1−2	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	60−65
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	250−260
medium / 768p	27−30	220−230
ultra / 1080p	7−8	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	−	70−75
high / 768p	16−18	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	0−1	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	21−24	180−190
medium / 1080p	0−1	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 740% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	0−1	65−70
low / 768p	18−20	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	0−1	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 75% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	0−1	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
high / 768p	12−14	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M3000M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	2 October 2015
Pipelines	192	1,024
Core clock speed	797 MHz	1050 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	67.20
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	2,150 gflops
Length	160 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	160 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	253 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro M3000M

Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares