Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro FX 5800 vs Quadro M3000M

    When comparing Quadro FX 5800 and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 5800 and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro FX 5800 Check Price
    Quadro M3000M Check Price

    Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:

    Quadro M3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro FX 5800 Quadro M3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 189 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin None
    Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro FX 5800 has 152% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
    • Quadro FX 5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro FX 5800 and Quadro M3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Quadro FX 5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • Quadro FX 5800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 440 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
    • Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 3−4 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 14−16 60−65
    medium / 1080p 5−6 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro FX 5800.

    Full Specs

      Quadro FX 5800 Quadro M3000M
    Architecture Tesla 2.0 Maxwell
    Code name GT200B GM204
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 11 November 2008 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 240 1,024
    Core clock speed 610 MHz 1050 MHz
    Transistor count 1,400 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 48.80 67.20
    Floating-point performance 622.1 gflops 2,150 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 512 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 5000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 160 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12
    Shader Model 4.0 5.0
    OpenGL 3.3 4.5
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
    CUDA 1.3 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 253 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares