Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K5000M vs Quadro M3000M

    When comparing Quadro K5000M and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K5000M and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro K5000M Check Price
    Quadro M3000M Check Price

    Quadro K5000M and Quadro M3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: Quadro K5000M and Quadro M3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M or Quadro M3000M here:

    Quadro K5000M Laptops
    Quadro M3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K5000M Quadro M3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K5000M has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
    • Quadro K5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K5000M and Quadro M3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • Quadro K5000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 344 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
    • Quadro K5000M and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 16−18 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 9−10 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 4−5 16−18
    4K / 2160p 4−5 10−11
    low / 720p 30−35 60−65
    medium / 1080p 20−22 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Quadro K5000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K5000M Quadro M3000M
    Architecture Kepler Maxwell
    Code name N14E-Q5 GM204
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 June 2012 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 1344 1,024
    Core clock speed 706 MHz 1050 MHz
    Transistor count 3,540 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 67.31 67.20
    Floating-point performance 1,615 gflops 2,150 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 3000 MHz 5000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 96 GB/s 160 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (11_0) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5.0
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.1.126
    CUDA + 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 51 Mh/s 253 Mh/s
    Laptop size large large
    Optimus + +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares