Quadro M3000M vs Radeon 540
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M3000M and Radeon 540, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M3000M stacks up against Radeon 540, check out specs charts below.
Radeon 540
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon 540.
- Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 540.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon 540 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon 540 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 540 is 50 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
- Quadro M3000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 540 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 292% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than Radeon 540. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon 540. |
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon 540 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Lexa |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 26 March 2019 |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 35.97 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 56 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |