Quadro M3000M vs Radeon R7 A265
When comparing Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 A265, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 A265 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A265
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M3000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 325 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro M3000M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Opal |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1,024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M3000M vs Radeon R9 280
- Quadro M3000M vs Radeon Pro 5300M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R9 280
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon Pro 5300M
- Quadro M3000M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Quadro M3000M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics