Quadro M3000M vs Radeon R9 FURY X
In this comparison between Quadro M3000M and Radeon R9 FURY X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 FURY X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M3000M
Radeon R9 FURY X
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
275 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
2x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 FURY X has 266% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M3000M and Radeon R9 FURY X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 FURY X - in Desktops.
Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 FURY X - with GCN 3.0.
Quadro M3000M and Radeon R9 FURY X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3950 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
10−11
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Quadro M3000M.
high / 1080p
55−60
80−85
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
QHD / 1440p
35−40
55−60
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
60−65
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Battlefield 5 is 44% more, than Quadro M3000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
220−230
230−240
ultra / 1080p
180−190
−
QHD / 1440p
110−120
150−160
4K / 2160p
70−75
100−110
high / 768p
210−220
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Quadro M3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Quadro M3000M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro M3000M.
high / 1080p
45−50
65−70
ultra / 1080p
40−45
60−65
QHD / 1440p
27−30
40−45
4K / 2160p
14−16
21−24
low / 720p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
45−50
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Quadro M3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
QHD / 1440p
27−30
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
21−24
low / 720p
180−190
220−230
medium / 1080p
110−120
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Fortnite is 29% more, than Quadro M3000M.
high / 1080p
60−65
85−90
ultra / 1080p
45−50
65−70
QHD / 1440p
30−35
50−55
4K / 2160p
24−27
30−35
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
65−70
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Quadro M3000M.
low / 768p
140−150
160−170
medium / 768p
120−130
150−160
high / 1080p
70−75
95−100
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
QHD / 1440p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Quadro M3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
95−100
medium / 1080p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Metro Exodus is 53% more, than Quadro M3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 FURY X.
high / 1080p
−
75−80
ultra / 1080p
14−16
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
120−130
medium / 1080p
18−20
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 95% more, than Quadro M3000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
7−8
10−12
low / 720p
65−70
95−100
medium / 1080p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 51% more, than Quadro M3000M.
low / 768p
130−140
190−200
medium / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
4K / 2160p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 48% more, than Quadro M3000M.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
50−55
65−70
high / 768p
60−65
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Quadro M3000M.
Full Specs
Quadro M3000M
Radeon R9 FURY X
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 3.0
Code name
GM204
Fiji
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
2 October 2015
24 June 2015
Pipelines
1,024
4096
Core clock speed
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
67.20
268.8
Floating-point performance
2,150 gflops
8,602 gflops
Length
191 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
4096 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
512 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12
Shader Model
5.0
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
5.2
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
858 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
TrueAudio
+
Mantle
+
Design
reference
Bridgeless CrossFire
+
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
33.4 Mh/s
Compute units
64
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
AppAcceleration
+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
FRTC
+
Check Price
Check Price