Quadro M3000M vs Radeon R9 FURY X

In this comparison between Quadro M3000M and Radeon R9 FURY X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M3000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 FURY X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:

Main Specs

  Quadro M3000M Radeon R9 FURY X
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 275 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon R9 FURY X has 266% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Quadro M3000M and Radeon R9 FURY X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
  • Quadro M3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 FURY X - in Desktops.
  • Quadro M3000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 FURY X - with GCN 3.0.
  • Quadro M3000M and Radeon R9 FURY X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3950 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 FURY X.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 35−40 50−55
ultra / 1080p 21−24 30−35
QHD / 1440p 16−18 27−30
4K / 2160p 10−11 14−16
low / 720p 60−65 75−80
medium / 1080p 40−45 60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 FURY X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Quadro M3000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro M3000M Radeon R9 FURY X
Architecture Maxwell GCN 3.0
Code name GM204 Fiji
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Release date 2 October 2015 24 June 2015
Pipelines 1,024 4096
Core clock speed 1050 MHz
Boost Clock 1050 MHz
Transistor count 5,200 million 8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 67.20 268.8
Floating-point performance 2,150 gflops 8,602 gflops
Length 191 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s 512 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12
Shader Model 5.0 6.3
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.126 +
CUDA 5.2
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 253 Mh/s 858 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Optimus +
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
PowerTune +
TrueAudio +
Mantle +
Design reference
Bridgeless CrossFire +
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
VCE +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 33.4 Mh/s
Compute units 64
Display Port 1.2
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
nView Display Management +
AppAcceleration +
High bandwidth memory (HBM) +
LiquidVR +
TressFX +
UVD +
FRTC +
  Check Price Check Price