FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M4000

When comparing FirePro V4900 and Quadro M4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Quadro M4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 60% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 27 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M4000 is 78 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 2008 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	35−40
ultra / 1080p	1−2	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	12−14	60−65
medium / 1080p	4−5	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	16−18	100−110
medium / 1080p	6−7	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V4900 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	250−260
medium / 768p	90−95	220−230
ultra / 1080p	40−45	180−190
QHD / 1440p	24−27	110−120
4K / 2160p	−	70−75
high / 768p	65−70	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 192% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro M4000.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	110−120
ultra / 1080p	24−27	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	45−50
ultra / 1080p	2−3	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	1−2	14−16
low / 720p	12−14	80−85
medium / 1080p	4−5	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	60−65
ultra / 1080p	6−7	45−50
QHD / 1440p	4−5	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	50−55	180−190
medium / 1080p	12−14	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 411% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	60−65
ultra / 1080p	6−7	45−50
QHD / 1440p	1−2	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	18−20	100−110
medium / 1080p	9−10	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 687% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	140−150
medium / 768p	35−40	120−130
high / 1080p	6−7	70−75
ultra / 1080p	3−4	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	5−6	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	130−140
high / 1080p	60−65	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	6−7	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	130−140
medium / 768p	10−11	85−90
high / 1080p	5−6	45−50
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
4K / 2160p	2−3	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 785% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
high / 768p	30−33	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro M4000
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Turks	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 November 2011	29 June 2015
Pipelines	480	1664
Core clock speed	800 MHz	773 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	80.39
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length	163 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s	299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares