FirePro V5900 vs Quadro M4000

In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro M4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 60% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 173 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M4000 is 11 mm longer, than FirePro V5900.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 4008 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	14−16	60−65
medium / 1080p	7−8	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	55−60
ultra / 1080p	8−9	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	10−12	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	250−260
medium / 768p	100−110	220−230
ultra / 1080p	50−55	180−190
QHD / 1440p	24−27	110−120
4K / 2160p	12−14	70−75
high / 768p	75−80	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	45−50
ultra / 1080p	5−6	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	5−6	14−16
low / 720p	16−18	80−85
medium / 1080p	7−8	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	55−60	180−190
medium / 1080p	18−20	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 328% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	8−9	24−27
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	12−14	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	10−11	70−75
ultra / 1080p	4−5	30−35
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	1−2	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	10−11	65−70
medium / 1080p	4−5	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	130−140
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	100−110
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	10−11	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	130−140
medium / 768p	12−14	85−90
high / 1080p	6−7	45−50
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
4K / 2160p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
high / 768p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro M4000
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Cayman	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	29 June 2015
Pipelines	512	1664
Core clock speed	600 MHz	773 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	80.39
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length	230 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares