FireStream 9370 vs Quadro M4000

In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Quadro M4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  FireStream 9370 Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 120 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Display Connectors 1x DisplayPort 4x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • FireStream 9370 has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
  • FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro M4000 has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
  • Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 52 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
  • FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
  • FireStream 9370 is 26 mm longer, than Quadro M4000.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 1408 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 12−14 35−40
ultra / 1080p 7−8 21−24
QHD / 1440p 2−3 16−18
4K / 2160p 10−11
low / 720p 27−30 60−65
medium / 1080p 16−18 40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FireStream 9370.

Full Specs

  FireStream 9370 Quadro M4000
Architecture TeraScale 2 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Cypress GM204
Type Desktop Workstation
Release date 23 June 2010 29 June 2015
Pipelines 1600 1664
Core clock speed 825 MHz 773 MHz
Transistor count 2,154 million 5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 66.00 80.39
Floating-point performance 2,640.0 gflops 2,573 gflops
Length 267 mm 241 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth 147.2 GB/s
DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12
Shader Model 5.0 5
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan N/A +
CUDA 5.2
SLI options +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
Width 1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays 4
nView Desktop Management +
Multi-display synchronization Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6 +
  Check Price