GRID K160Q vs Quadro M4000

When choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro M4000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K160Q and Quadro M4000.

GRID K160Q

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K160Q has 8% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M4000 has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 77 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
GRID K160Q and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 4226 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	9−10	60−65
medium / 1080p	1−2	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	1−2	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	8−9	100−110
medium / 1080p	2−3	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K160Q and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	250−260
medium / 768p	75−80	220−230
ultra / 1080p	30−35	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	9−10	70−75
high / 768p	50−55	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GRID K160Q and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	35−40	110−120
ultra / 1080p	14−16	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	6−7	80−85
medium / 1080p	1−2	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	40−45	180−190
medium / 1080p	3−4	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	10−12	100−110
medium / 1080p	3−4	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	35−40	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	0−1	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	85−90	130−140
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	1−2	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	3−4	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	2−3	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	50−55
high / 768p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K160Q	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	29 June 2015
Pipelines	192	1664
Core clock speed	850 MHz	773 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	80.39
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
		Check Price

GRID K160Q vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares