GRID K240Q vs Quadro M4000

When comparing GRID K240Q and Quadro M4000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro M4000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K240Q

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K240Q has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M4000 has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 28 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 1008 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	16−18	55−60
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	35−40	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	170−180	250−260
medium / 768p	140−150	220−230
ultra / 1080p	75−80	180−190
QHD / 1440p	40−45	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	110−120	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	75−80	110−120
ultra / 1080p	45−50	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−12	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	80−85
medium / 1080p	12−14	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	75−80	180−190
medium / 1080p	35−40	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 175% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
QHD / 1440p	4−5	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	35−40	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	65−70	140−150
medium / 768p	60−65	120−130
high / 1080p	20−22	70−75
ultra / 1080p	9−10	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
low / 720p	20−22	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	100−110	130−140
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	20−22	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	35−40	130−140
medium / 768p	24−27	85−90
high / 1080p	12−14	45−50
ultra / 1080p	8−9	24−27
4K / 2160p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	50−55
high / 768p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GRID K240Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK104	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	29 June 2015
Pipelines	1536	1664
Core clock speed	745 MHz	773 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	80.39
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
		Check Price

GRID K240Q vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares