Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro M4000
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro M4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
120 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000 has 700% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M4000 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 473 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
190−200
250−260
medium / 768p
160−170
220−230
ultra / 1080p
85−90
180−190
QHD / 1440p
45−50
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
120−130
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
110−120
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
85−90
180−190
medium / 1080p
45−50
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 128% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
75−80
140−150
medium / 768p
65−70
120−130
high / 1080p
24−27
70−75
ultra / 1080p
10−11
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
100−110
130−140
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
45−50
130−140
medium / 768p
27−30
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
9−10
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Quadro M4000
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GM204
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2017
29 June 2015
Pipelines
48
1664
Core clock speed
300 MHz
773 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
80.39
Floating-point performance
2,573 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
+
CUDA
5.2
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
299 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Multi-display synchronization
Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6
+
Check Price
Check Price
