NVS 510 vs Quadro M4000

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing NVS 510 and Quadro M4000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro M4000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 242% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 6 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 24 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
NVS 510 and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M4000 is 81 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 4226 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	1−2	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	60−65
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	250−260
medium / 768p	27−30	220−230
ultra / 1080p	7−8	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	−	70−75
high / 768p	16−18	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	0−1	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	21−24	180−190
medium / 1080p	0−1	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	0−1	65−70
low / 768p	18−20	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	0−1	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	0−1	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
high / 768p	12−14	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	29 June 2015
Pipelines	192	1664
Core clock speed	797 MHz	773 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	80.39
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length	160 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares