NVS 810 vs Quadro M4000

When choosing between NVS 810 and Quadro M4000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between NVS 810 and Quadro M4000.

NVS 810 Check Price

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 76% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M4000 has 6 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 129 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
NVS 810 and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M4000 is 43 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 4208 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	35−40
ultra / 1080p	1−2	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	12−14	60−65
medium / 1080p	4−5	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	16−18	100−110
medium / 1080p	6−7	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 810 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	250−260
medium / 768p	95−100	220−230
ultra / 1080p	40−45	180−190
QHD / 1440p	21−24	110−120
4K / 2160p	16−18	70−75
high / 768p	65−70	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	110−120
ultra / 1080p	21−24	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	45−50
ultra / 1080p	2−3	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	10−12	80−85
medium / 1080p	4−5	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	4−5	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	50−55	180−190
medium / 1080p	10−12	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	3−4	30−35
4K / 2160p	2−3	24−27
low / 720p	18−20	100−110
medium / 1080p	8−9	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	4−5	70−75
ultra / 1080p	2−3	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	4−5	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	130−140
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	6−7	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	130−140
medium / 768p	8−9	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	45−50
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
4K / 2160p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
high / 768p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	29 June 2015
Pipelines	512	1664
Core clock speed	902 MHz	773 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	80.39
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length	198 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	5.0	5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares