Quadro K2200 vs Quadro M4000

When choosing between Quadro K2200 and Quadro M4000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2200 and Quadro M4000.

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 76% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
Quadro K2200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 273 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
Quadro K2200 and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M4000 is 39 mm longer, than Quadro K2200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 996 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	5−6	16−18
4K / 2160p	4−5	10−11
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	27−30	55−60
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	8−9	35−40
4K / 2160p	6−7	18−20
low / 720p	60−65	100−110
medium / 1080p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2200 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	220−230	250−260
medium / 768p	190−200	220−230
ultra / 1080p	110−120	180−190
QHD / 1440p	75−80	110−120
4K / 2160p	40−45	70−75
high / 768p	160−170	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro K2200 and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	75−80	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	21−24	45−50
ultra / 1080p	20−22	40−45
QHD / 1440p	18−20	27−30
4K / 2160p	7−8	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	80−85
medium / 1080p	24−27	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	27−30	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
QHD / 1440p	14−16	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	110−120	180−190
medium / 1080p	65−70	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
QHD / 1440p	10−12	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	60−65	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	95−100	140−150
medium / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	35−40	70−75
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−35
QHD / 1440p	5−6	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K2200.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	65−70	130−140
medium / 768p	40−45	85−90
high / 1080p	21−24	45−50
ultra / 1080p	12−14	24−27
4K / 2160p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
high / 768p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro K2200.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014	29 June 2015
Pipelines	640	1664
Core clock speed	1046 MHz	773 MHz
Boost Clock	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.96	80.39
Floating-point performance	1,439 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length	202 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	5.0	5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	162 Mh/s	299 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	1.6 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K2200 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares