Quadro K620 vs Quadro M4000

In this comparison between Quadro K620 and Quadro M4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K620 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K620 Check Price

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K620	Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M4000 has 192% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Quadro K620 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K620.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K620 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 285 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000.
Quadro K620 and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M4000 is 81 mm longer, than Quadro K620.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 4208 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	24−27	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	18−20	55−60
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
QHD / 1440p	2−3	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	20−22	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	180−190	250−260
medium / 768p	150−160	220−230
ultra / 1080p	75−80	180−190
QHD / 1440p	45−50	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	110−120	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	110−120
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	12−14	45−50
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	5−6	14−16
low / 720p	30−33	80−85
medium / 1080p	14−16	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	20−22	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	80−85	180−190
medium / 1080p	40−45	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 155% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	20−22	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
QHD / 1440p	5−6	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	70−75	140−150
medium / 768p	60−65	120−130
high / 1080p	21−24	70−75
ultra / 1080p	9−10	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−11	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	100−110	130−140
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K620.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	40−45	130−140
medium / 768p	24−27	85−90
high / 1080p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
4K / 2160p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Quadro K620.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	50−55
high / 768p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro K620.

Full Specs

	Quadro K620	Quadro M4000
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GM107	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014	29 June 2015
Pipelines	384	1664
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	773 MHz
Boost Clock	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	26.98	80.39
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	2,573 gflops
Length	160 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	6008 MHz
DirectX	12	12
Shader Model	5	5
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	5.0	5.2
SLI options		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	104 Mh/s	299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+	+
Mosaic	+	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4	4
nView Desktop Management	+	+
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K620 vs Quadro M4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares