Quadro M4000 vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between Quadro M4000 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M4000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro M4000 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro M4000	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 105% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
Quadro M4000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M4000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 199 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 7 mm longer, than Quadro M4000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 2876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	35−40	6−7
4K / 2160p	18−20	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro M4000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	220−230	190−200
ultra / 1080p	180−190	100−110
QHD / 1440p	110−120	65−70
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−35
high / 768p	210−220	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro M4000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−11
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	140−150	90−95
medium / 768p	120−130	80−85
high / 1080p	70−75	30−35
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
QHD / 1440p	21−24	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	20−22	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	30−35	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	130−140	60−65
medium / 768p	85−90	35−40
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	Quadro M4000	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GM204	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	29 June 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1664	448
Core clock speed	773 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	5,200 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	80.39	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,573 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	241 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth		150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	5.2	2.0
SLI options	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	299 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4
nView Desktop Management	+
Multi-display synchronization	Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M4000 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares