FirePro S7000 vs Quadro M4000M
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000M.
FirePro S7000
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro M4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 212 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 59% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 58% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro M4000M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Pitcairn | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1,280 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 975 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 251 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |