FirePro V5900 vs Quadro M4000M
In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro M4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro M4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 33% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 375 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
7−8
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
130−140
250−260
medium / 768p
100−110
220−230
ultra / 1080p
50−55
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
12−14
70−75
high / 768p
75−80
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
16−18
80−85
medium / 1080p
7−8
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
18−20
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 328% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
8−9
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
10−11
70−75
ultra / 1080p
4−5
30−35
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
1−2
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
10−11
65−70
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 46% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
10−11
65−70
medium / 1080p
9−10
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro M4000M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Maxwell
Code name
Cayman
GM204
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
2 October 2015
Pipelines
512
1,280
Core clock speed
600 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
78.00
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
2,496 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.0
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price