Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro V7900 vs Quadro M4000M

    When comparing FirePro V7900 and Quadro M4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V7900 and Quadro M4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro V7900 Check Price
    Quadro M4000M Check Price

    Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:

    Quadro M4000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro V7900 Quadro M4000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 151 Watt 100 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro V7900 has 51% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
    • FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
    • FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 250 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
    • FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 10−12 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 6−7 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 1−2 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 24−27 60−65
    medium / 1080p 14−16 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than FirePro V7900.

    Full Specs

      FirePro V7900 Quadro M4000M
    Architecture TeraScale 3 Maxwell
    Code name Cayman GM204
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 24 May 2011 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 1280 1,280
    Core clock speed 725 MHz 975 MHz
    Boost Clock 1013 MHz
    Transistor count 2,640 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 58.00 78.00
    Floating-point performance 1,856.0 gflops 2,496 gflops
    Length 279 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 5012 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160 GB/s 160 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12
    Shader Model 5.0 5.0
    OpenGL 4.4 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.2
    Bus support PCIe 2.1 x16
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 171 Mh/s 251 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Form factor full height / full length
    StereoOutput3D +
    DisplayPort count 4
    Dual-link DVI support +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares