Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W5000 vs Quadro M4000M

    In this comparison between FirePro W5000 and Quadro M4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W5000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro W5000 Check Price
    Quadro M4000M Check Price

    Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:

    Quadro M4000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W5000 Quadro M4000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M4000M has 33% more power consumption, than FirePro W5000.
    • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
    • Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W5000.
    • FirePro W5000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 150 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.
    • FirePro W5000 and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 1812 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 14−16 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 9−10 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 4−5 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 30−35 60−65
    medium / 1080p 18−20 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than FirePro W5000.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W5000 Quadro M4000M
    Architecture GCN 1.0 Maxwell
    Code name Pitcairn GM204
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 7 August 2012 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 768 1,280
    Core clock speed 825 MHz 975 MHz
    Boost Clock 1013 MHz
    Transistor count 2,800 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 39.60 78.00
    Floating-point performance 1,267 gflops 2,496 gflops
    Length 183 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 3200 MHz 5012 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 160 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5.0
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.2
    Bus support PCIe 3.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 154 Mh/s 251 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Form factor full height / half length
    DisplayPort count 2
    Dual-link DVI support +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares