Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W600 vs Quadro M4000M

    In this comparison between FirePro W600 and Quadro M4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W600 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro W600 Check Price
    Quadro M4000M Check Price

    Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:

    Quadro M4000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W600 Quadro M4000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 6x mini-DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M4000M has 33% more power consumption, than FirePro W600.
    • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
    • Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W600.
    • FirePro W600 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 225 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.
    • FirePro W600 and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 8−9 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 5−6 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 18−20 60−65
    medium / 1080p 10−11 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro W600.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W600 Quadro M4000M
    Architecture GCN 1.0 Maxwell
    Code name Cape Verde GM204
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 13 June 2012 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 512 1,280
    Core clock speed 750 MHz 975 MHz
    Boost Clock 1013 MHz
    Transistor count 1,500 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 24.00 78.00
    Floating-point performance 768.0 gflops 2,496 gflops
    Length 163 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 5012 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 160 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12
    Shader Model 5.1 5.0
    OpenGL 4.6 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 94 Mh/s 251 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares