FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000M
When choosing between FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M.
FirePro W8100
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 120% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 151 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 1% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| FirePro W8100 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Hawaii | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1,280 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 251 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |