GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro M4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M10 8Q and Quadro M4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro M4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro M4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M10 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000M.
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M10 8Q and Quadro M4000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 58 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
- GRID M10 8Q and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 188 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 123% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M10 8Q | Quadro M4000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM107 | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 18 May 2016 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1,280 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1013 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |