Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro M4000M
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M4000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro M4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 675 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
250−260
medium / 768p
85−90
220−230
ultra / 1080p
40−45
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
60−65
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
24−27
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
12−14
80−85
medium / 1080p
6−7
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
50−55
180−190
medium / 1080p
14−16
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
18−20
100−110
medium / 1080p
10−11
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
140−150
medium / 768p
35−40
120−130
high / 1080p
8−9
70−75
ultra / 1080p
5−6
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
2−3
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro M4000M
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Maxwell
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
2 October 2015
Pipelines
48
1,280
Core clock speed
300 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1013 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
78.00
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
2,496 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price