Quadro 7000 vs Quadro M4000M
In this comparison between Quadro 7000 and Quadro M4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 7000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 7000
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 7000 | Quadro M4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 104% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- Quadro 7000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000M.
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 324 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 1608 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 7000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro 7000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 81% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro 7000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro 7000. |
Full Specs
Quadro 7000 | Quadro M4000M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GF110 | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 2 May 2012 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1,280 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 975 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.0 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |