Quadro FX 5800 vs Quadro M4000M
In this comparison between Quadro FX 5800 and Quadro M4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 5800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 5800
Quadro M4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
189 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro FX 5800 has 89% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
Quadro FX 5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro FX 5800 and Quadro M4000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro FX 5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro FX 5800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 365 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
35−40
ultra / 1080p
1−2
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
8−9
55−60
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
20−22
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
120−130
250−260
medium / 768p
95−100
220−230
ultra / 1080p
45−50
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
70−75
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−33
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
4−5
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
14−16
80−85
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
55−60
180−190
medium / 1080p
16−18
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
7−8
60−65
ultra / 1080p
6−7
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
21−24
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
9−10
70−75
ultra / 1080p
4−5
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
2−3
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
18−20
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
4K / 2160p
1−2
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
high / 768p
30−35
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
Full Specs
Quadro FX 5800
Quadro M4000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell
Code name
GT200B
GM204
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
11 November 2008
2 October 2015
Pipelines
240
1,280
Core clock speed
610 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
48.80
78.00
Floating-point performance
622.1 gflops
2,496 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
512 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12
Shader Model
4.0
5.0
OpenGL
3.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
1.3
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
