Quadro K1000M vs Quadro M4000M
When comparing Quadro K1000M and Quadro M4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Quadro M4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro M4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K1000M and Quadro M4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M
Quadro M4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 122% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3212 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
1−2
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
60−65
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K1000M and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
7−8
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
16−18
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
Quadro K1000M and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 740% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
18−20
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 75% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
high / 768p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M
Quadro M4000M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
N14P-Q1
GM204
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
2 October 2015
Pipelines
192
1,280
Core clock speed
850 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
78.00
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
2,496 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price