Quadro M4000M vs Radeon 550X
When comparing Quadro M4000M and Radeon 550X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M4000M and Radeon 550X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon 550X
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon 550X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon 550X.
- Quadro M4000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 550X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 550X.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon 550X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon 550X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 550X is 107 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
- Quadro M4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 550X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 550X is 1988 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 370% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 264% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than Radeon 550X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon 550X. |
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon 550X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Lexa |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 27 March 2019 |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1218 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 38.98 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |