Quadro M4000M vs Radeon E8860
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M4000M and Radeon E8860, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M4000M stacks up against Radeon E8860, check out specs charts below.
Radeon E8860
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon E8860 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 37 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 170% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro M4000M and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 512 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 370% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 264% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon E8860. |
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon E8860 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |