Quadro M4000M vs Radeon HD 4770
When choosing between Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 4770, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 4770.
Radeon HD 4770
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon HD 4770 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 80 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 25% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4770.
- Quadro M4000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4770 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4770 has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000M.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon HD 4770 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon HD 4770 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 225 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
- Quadro M4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4770 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 1812 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4770.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 4770 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro M4000M and Radeon HD 4770 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Radeon HD 4770. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon HD 4770. |
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon HD 4770 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | RV740 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 28 April 2009 |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 750 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 826 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 24.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
Length | 203 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Quadro M4000M vs Quadro M4000
- Radeon HD 4770 vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Quadro M4000
- Quadro M4000M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro M4000M vs Radeon HD 6850M
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon HD 6850M