Quadro M4000M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M4000M has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
Quadro M4000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 2612 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
16−18
9−10
4K / 2160p
10−11
6−7
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
35−40
18−20
4K / 2160p
18−20
10−11
low / 720p
100−110
75−80
medium / 1080p
60−65
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
240−250
medium / 768p
220−230
210−220
ultra / 1080p
180−190
130−140
QHD / 1440p
110−120
100−110
4K / 2160p
70−75
60−65
high / 768p
210−220
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Quadro M4000M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
45−50
30−33
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
QHD / 1440p
27−30
21−24
4K / 2160p
14−16
9−10
low / 720p
80−85
60−65
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−33
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
30−35
18−20
4K / 2160p
24−27
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
75−80
medium / 1080p
65−70
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 43% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
140−150
110−120
medium / 768p
120−130
100−110
high / 1080p
70−75
45−50
ultra / 1080p
30−35
20−22
QHD / 1440p
21−24
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
4−5
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
130−140
85−90
medium / 768p
85−90
55−60
high / 1080p
45−50
30−33
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
4K / 2160p
16−18
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Maxwell
Vega
Code name
GM204
Vega Mobile
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
15 November 2018
Pipelines
1,280
1024
Core clock speed
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
78.00
76.16
Floating-point performance
2,496 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
251 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
