Quadro M4000M vs Radeon R5 M435
In this comparison between Quadro M4000M and Radeon R5 M435 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 M435 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 M435
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 M435 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 M435 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R5 M435 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 195 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
- Quadro M4000M and Radeon R5 M435 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 512 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 M435.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M4000M and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 216% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro M4000M and Radeon R5 M435 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 6−7 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R5 M435. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon R5 M435. |
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon R5 M435 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Jet |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 36 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |