Quadro M4000M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
In this comparison between Quadro M4000M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 255 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- Quadro M4000M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. |
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM204 | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Quadro M4000M vs Quadro M4000
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Quadro M4000
- Quadro M4000M vs Radeon HD 4890
- Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX