Quadro M4000M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M4000M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 5008 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro M4000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 1,280 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Quadro M4000M vs Quadro M4000
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro M4000
- Quadro M4000M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro M4000M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M