Quadro M4000M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M4000M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Quadro M4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M4000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 250 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3887 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 421% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M4000M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1,280 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 975 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 78.00 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |