GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Quadro M5000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Quadro M5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460M SLI will be the best choice, for others Quadro M5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Quadro M5000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Quadro M5000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M SLI or Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Quadro M5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2x1536 MB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M5000M has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro M5000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro M5000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 287 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
low / 768p
190−200
250−260
medium / 768p
160−170
220−230
ultra / 1080p
85−90
180−190
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
120−130
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
110−120
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
90−95
180−190
medium / 1080p
45−50
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
low / 768p
75−80
140−150
medium / 768p
65−70
120−130
high / 1080p
24−27
70−75
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
low / 768p
100−110
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−105
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
130−140
medium / 768p
27−30
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
Quadro M5000M
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell
Code name
N11E-GS
GM204
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
3 September 2010
2 October 2015
Pipelines
384
1,536
Core clock speed
675 MHz
962 MHz
Boost Clock
1051 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
93.60
Floating-point performance
2,995 gflops
Memory bus width
192 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
12
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
366 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price