GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro M5000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M5000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M5000M.
GeForce GTX 760A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro M5000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M5000M has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M5000M has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M5000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 334 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro M5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 335% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro M5000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK106 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1,536 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 962 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1051 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 93.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Quadro M5000M vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Quadro M5000M vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile