GRID K160Q vs Quadro M5000M
In this comparison between GRID K160Q and Quadro M5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K160Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro M5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than Quadro M5000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M5000M has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M5000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 112 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q and Quadro M5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K160Q and Quadro M5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K160Q and Quadro M5000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 552% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro M5000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK107 | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1,536 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 962 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 93.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2,995 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |