HD Graphics P630 vs Quadro M5000M
When comparing HD Graphics P630 and Quadro M5000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between HD Graphics P630 and Quadro M5000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
HD Graphics P630
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Quadro M5000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M5000M has 566% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M5000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1732 GB more memory, than Quadro M5000M.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro M5000M - with Maxwell.
- HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 112% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 357% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than HD Graphics P630. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Quadro M5000M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Maxwell |
Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 5 August 2016 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 24 | 1,536 |
Core clock speed | 962 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1051 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 93.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- HD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 460M
- HD Graphics P630 vs HD Graphics 630
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 460M
- Quadro M5000M vs HD Graphics 630
- HD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- HD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile