Quadro M5000M vs Radeon E8860
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro M5000M and Radeon E8860. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro M5000M and Radeon E8860. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon E8860
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M5000M | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M5000M has 170% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M5000M has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro M5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M5000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 387 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro M5000M and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 370% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 264% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M5000M | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1,536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 962 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 93.60 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |