Quadro M5000M vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between Quadro M5000M and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M5000M and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M5000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M5000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro M5000M has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Quadro M5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- Quadro M5000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 62 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- Quadro M5000M and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M5000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
Quadro M5000M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X. |
Full Specs
Quadro M5000M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Litho |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1,536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 962 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 93.60 | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |