Quadro M5000M vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Quadro M5000M and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M5000M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M5000M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than Quadro M5000M.
- Quadro M5000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M5000M has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro M5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M5000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 388 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro M5000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M5000M is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro M5000M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Quadro M5000M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
Quadro M5000M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM204 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1,536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 962 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 93.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 590
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost