FirePro S7150 vs Quadro M500M
When comparing FirePro S7150 and Quadro M500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and Quadro M500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7150
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro M500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 109 MHz higher, than FirePro S7150.
- FirePro S7150 and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 996 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
FirePro S7150 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 812% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Quadro M500M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Quadro M500M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tonga | GM108 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 15 December 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 17.98 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4004 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |