FirePro S9000 vs Quadro M500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Quadro M500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro M500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 1066% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 129 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1496 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 812% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M500M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 15 December 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 4004 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |