FireStream 9370 vs Quadro M500M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro M500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro M500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro M500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 204 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M500M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 596 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro M500M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | GM108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 15 December 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4004 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |