GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro M500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost stacks up against Quadro M500M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro M500M
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 346% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M500M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 49 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M500M is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 237% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
27−30
5−6
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
16−18
medium / 1080p
30−33
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 337% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
110−120
medium / 768p
180−190
85−90
ultra / 1080p
100−110
40−45
QHD / 1440p
60−65
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−35
18−20
high / 768p
150−160
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
110−120
70−75
medium / 768p
100−110
50−55
ultra / 1080p
70−75
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
20−22
1−2
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
10−12
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 460% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
27−30
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
12−14
1−2
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
60−65
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 187% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
27−30
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
low / 720p
55−60
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−35
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
80−85
35−40
high / 1080p
30−35
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
10−11
1−2
ultra / 1080p
8−9
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
6−7
medium / 1080p
14−16
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
6−7
medium / 1080p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 260% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
60−65
14−16
medium / 768p
35−40
10−11
high / 1080p
21−24
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Quadro M500M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro M500M
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK106
GM108
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
15 December 2015
Pipelines
768
384
Core clock speed
980 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
17.98
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
4004 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
