GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro M500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M6 8Q and Quadro M500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro M500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M6 8Q
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro M500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 307 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 1008 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GRID M6 8Q and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 98% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 520% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 350% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Quadro M500M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GM204 | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 15 December 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4004 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |