Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro M500M
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M500M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M500M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro M500M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro M500M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 829 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro M500M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−12
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
14−16
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
16−18
medium / 1080p
16−18
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 137% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
110−120
medium / 768p
130−140
85−90
ultra / 1080p
65−70
40−45
QHD / 1440p
35−40
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
18−20
high / 768p
100−110
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
70−75
medium / 768p
70−75
50−55
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
10−12
1−2
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
10−12
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
18−20
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 70% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
16−18
6−7
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
60−65
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
6−7
1−2
ultra / 1080p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
6−7
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
100−110
85−90
high / 1080p
95−100
70−75
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
30−35
14−16
medium / 768p
21−24
10−11
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
high / 768p
40−45
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro M500M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro M500M
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Maxwell
Code name
Haswell GT3e
GM108
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
15 December 2015
Pipelines
40
384
Core clock speed
200 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1124 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
17.98
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
863.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4004 MHz
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.3
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
